Humans breeding

... continued: so some would draw analogy with breeds.

You look at dogs, which were bred from other breeds, thereafter found to be - for a certain purpose - more superior than their more inferior ancestors.

Here, clearly, you could argue that it was a good idea.

Then you could argue that mixing the breeds is a bad idea: those characteristic superior traits just tend to get lost.


Oh no, so it's a bad idea now.


Truth be told I feel like simply concluding it's probably a good idea if it takes place at the right moment and in the right place.

You can't examine such questions outside the context.
Never a good idea? Absolutely wrong.
Never a bad idea? Probably wrong too.

Finding measures, optimal proportions, limits of the validity domain of those tools and values - uncertainties and all those moments that relate even if we were only to involve a statistical qualitative approach, are beyond the scope of this argument (and probably beyond the capabilities this mind, too).

As a side note, humans have been breeding themselves for millennia, think of your surname, if you wouldn't just believe me.